Namib Minerals Provides Business Update and Reports Full Year 2025 Results
How Mine Production and Milling Capacity Expansion on Track
Redwing Mine Restart Program Advances with Dewatering Milestone
Tulani Sikwila Named CEO and Leadership Team Expanded to Support Growth Strategy
Management to Host Business Update Conference Call on
“Namib Minerals continues to make disciplined progress against our strategic roadmap to expand production,” said Tulani Sikwila, Chief Executive Officer. “2025 was a year of disciplined progress as we executed against our strategy to stabilize operations, increase production capacity, and expand our resource base.”
“I look forward to continuing executing our long-term vision of building a scalable, capital-efficient African mining platform that creates value for Namib’s investors, employees, and communities. Our strong operational expertise, deep regional relationships, and institutional governance as a Nasdaq-listed company ideally positions Namib to unlock value from underdeveloped assets.”
Financial and Operational Results
For the year ended
A significant increase in the average realized gold price during the year helped offset lower grades and reduced production, supporting stable gross profit performance.
Cost performance remained disciplined across operations. Total production costs were approximately
Despite this dynamic, Namib maintained strong profitability, generating gross profit of
Non-cash items related to the Company’s public listing had a significant impact on reported results but did not affect cash flows. These included a
Cash flow generation remained solid despite lower production levels. Net cash provided by operating activities was
The Company maintains a solid balance sheet to support its growth strategy. Total assets increased to
Operational Update
At our flagship How Mine we continue to focus on increasing throughput, improving equipment availability, maintaining recovery rates, and stabilizing grade. We have put in place several initiatives to improve grade consistency, including tighter grade controls, improved mine planning, and stronger operating discipline underground. These measures are intended to support more predictable production and cost performance over time.
The planned expansion of ore milling capacity at How from 40,500 to 55,000 tonnes per month remains on track with the upgraded facility expected to come online in the second half of 2026.
Namib continues to focus on operational efficiency improvements at How while advancing development work at its brownfield growth projects, including the restart process at the
Preliminary Capital Requirements
The Company continues to evaluate funding options for the Redwing restart, with a focus on phased capital deployment aligned with project milestones. Namib is prioritizing non-dilutive and minimally dilutive funding solutions where possible and has engaged with strategic capital providers, including development finance institutions as part of a broader process to evaluate and raise the required funding in a phased and systematic manner.
A Strengthened Leadership Team
In March, Tulani Sikwila was appointed Chief Executive Officer. A veteran of the Company, Mr. Sikwila brings an unparalleled understanding of Namib’s history, assets, and strategic priorities and is ideally placed to drive the next chapter of growth.
The Namib leadership team was further strengthened with the appointment of
In addition,
2026 Guidance
For 2026, at
Conference Call Information
Interested investors and other parties can listen to a webcast of the live conference call by logging onto the Investor Relations section of the Company's website at https://namibminerals.gcs-web.com/. An archived replay of the webcast will be available on the Company’s website shortly after the event concludes.
About
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this update are forward-looking statements. Any statements that refer to estimates or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are also forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, our management teams’ expectations of funding frameworks and anticipated timelines, 2026 guidance and related assumptions, expanding operational capacity at the
Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures
The Company utilizes non-IFRS financial measures, including Adjusted EBITDA and C1 cost per ounce, to complement its IFRS reporting and provide stakeholders with a deeper understanding of our operational performance and financial health. These measures offer insights into trends and factors that IFRS metrics may not fully capture. Non-IFRS financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information presented in compliance with IFRS, and non-IFRS financial measures as used by
Adjusted EBITDA
The Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as profit for the period before finance cost, related party credit loss, taxes, changes in the fair value of earnout liability, changes in fair value of warrants, listing expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment, interest income, financial guarantee remeasurement, transaction expense and disposal of investment.
| Year ended |
||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||
| Profit / (loss) for the period | $ | 101,180 | $ | 3,588 | $ | 3,627 | ||||||
| Finance cost | 1,952 | 1,522 | 2,415 | |||||||||
| Related party credit loss | — | 1,426 | 6,818 | |||||||||
| Income tax expense | 7,327 | 10,907 | 5,254 | |||||||||
| Change in fair value of earnout liability | (158,822 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrants | (5,725 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Listing expense | 65,381 | — | — | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 7,267 | 4,141 | 2,705 | |||||||||
| Impairment | 240 | 5,724 | — | |||||||||
| Interest income | (16 | ) | (14 | ) | (114 | ) | ||||||
| Financial guarantee remeasurement | — | (2,746 | ) | (486 | ) | |||||||
| Transaction expense | 10,220 | — | — | |||||||||
| Disposal of investment | — | — | 41 | |||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 29,004 | $ | 24,548 | $ | 20,260 | ||||||
C1 cost per ounce
The Company defines C1 cost as the sum of IFRS production costs and royalties’ expense. C1 cost per ounce is calculated as the C1 cost divided by the ounces of gold sold.
| Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands, unless | Year ended |
Year ended |
Year ended |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| otherwise indicated) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production cost (IFRS) | $ | 36,958 | 38,648 | 36,501 | — | 23 | 241 | 36,958 | 38,671 | 36,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Royalties | 4,138 | 4,279 | 3,153 | — | 2 | 6 | 4,138 | 4,281 | 3,159 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| C1 cost | $ | 41,096 | 42,927 | 39,654 | — | 25 | 247 | 41,096 | 42,952 | 39,901 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gold sales (oz) | 24,860 | 37,239 | 33,585 | — | 107 | 409 | 24,860 | 37,346 | 33,994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| C1 cost per ounce ($/oz) | $ | 1,653 | 1,153 | 1,181 | — | 234 | 604 | 1,653 | 1,150 | 1,174 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contacts:
Investor Relations:
IR@namibminerals.com
Source: Namib Minerals

